Unveiling the Myth- Debunking False Statements About Appellate Courts

Which of the following is false regarding appellate courts?

Appellate courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by reviewing decisions made by lower courts. They ensure that the law is applied correctly and that the decisions made are fair and just. However, there are several misconceptions about appellate courts that need to be addressed. In this article, we will explore some of the most common myths and determine which statement is false regarding appellate courts.

Myth 1: Appellate courts have the power to make new laws.

One of the most widespread misconceptions about appellate courts is that they have the authority to create new laws. However, this statement is false. Appellate courts are not legislative bodies and do not have the power to create new laws. Their primary function is to review the decisions made by lower courts and determine if those decisions were made correctly and in accordance with the law. Appellate courts can only interpret and apply existing laws, not create new ones.

Myth 2: Appellate courts only hear appeals from criminal cases.

Another common misconception is that appellate courts only handle appeals from criminal cases. This statement is false. Appellate courts have jurisdiction over both civil and criminal cases. They review appeals from both types of cases to ensure that the lower court’s decision was made correctly and in accordance with the law. While criminal cases may receive more media attention, appellate courts are equally involved in reviewing civil cases, such as disputes over contracts, property, and family law.

Myth 3: Appellate courts are more lenient than lower courts.

Some people believe that appellate courts are more lenient than lower courts, which is false. Appellate courts are not lenient; they are simply reviewing the decisions made by lower courts. The primary goal of appellate courts is to ensure that the lower court’s decision was made correctly and in accordance with the law. If an appellate court finds that a lower court’s decision was incorrect, it may reverse the decision or send the case back to the lower court for further proceedings. Appellate courts are not interested in the outcome of the case but rather in the legal principles and procedures that were followed.

Myth 4: Appellate courts always uphold the decisions of lower courts.

This statement is false. Appellate courts do not always uphold the decisions of lower courts. If an appellate court finds that a lower court’s decision was incorrect, it has the authority to reverse the decision or send the case back for a new trial. The purpose of appellate courts is to ensure that the law is applied correctly and that the decisions made are fair and just. This means that they are not afraid to overrule a lower court’s decision if it is found to be incorrect.

In conclusion, the false statement regarding appellate courts is that they have the power to make new laws. Appellate courts are responsible for reviewing decisions made by lower courts, ensuring that the law is applied correctly, and that the decisions made are fair and just. They do not have the authority to create new laws, are involved in both civil and criminal cases, are not lenient, and do not always uphold the decisions of lower courts.